**Headline: Supreme Court Says “Bye-Bye” to Racial Gerrymandering in Alabama—What a Shocker!**
The Supreme Court just tossed out Alabama’s congressional map that insisted on two majority-Black districts. You’d think this was a big deal, but let’s be real: it’s just another day in the life of political maneuvering.
Now, Wall Street Journal columnist Jason Riley is chiming in, making it clear he’s not a fan of what he calls “racial gerrymandering.” Because apparently, drawing districts that cater to racial demographics is fine as long as it fits the agenda. But when the shoe’s on the other foot? Suddenly, it’s a problem.
So, what’s the takeaway here? The court’s decision reveals a whole lot about how we play the game of politics. It’s not really about fairness; it’s about who’s holding the pen when the maps are drawn.
Isn’t it amusing how some folks are only against gerrymandering when it doesn’t suit their narrative?
By Admin | Published: May 12, 2026 at 5:15 am
